Non-negotiable: Non-dialogical feedback strategies in mid-term exams ina university of Lima in an intercultural context
Abstract
In a context of cultural and social insertion of students from disadvantaged sectors, in this paper, which is based on my master’s thesis (2017), I examine the feedback given by two university professors in the mid-term exams of the History and Ethics courses. This study was carried out from the critical conception of language as social practice (Fairclough, 1992) and the Appraisal Theory (Martin and White, 2005). The aim of this research is to explain the ways in which feedback is conveyed in the mid-term exams and to find out whether the discursive strategies employed by these teachers are constructed in a dialogical way. The results show professors’ preference for evaluating negatively and for using linguistic strategies that close the channels of dialogue and reproduce hierarchical relations.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2020 Magaly Arcela Pérez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain their rights:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, as well as any process or procedure described in the article.
b.The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, perform and communicate publicly the article published in the Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their work, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), as long as they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).














